Abstract:The marginal likelihood, also known as the evidence, is regarded as a mathematical embodiment of Occam's razor, enabling model selection that avoids overfitting. The evidence lower bound (ELBO) objective from variational inference has also been used for similar purposes. Prior work has shown that restricting the approximate posterior family via a mean-field approximation can lead the ELBO to underfit. In this paper, we show how ELBO-based hyperparameter learning in a simple over-parameterized regression model can also produce overfitting, depending on the assumed rank of the covariance matrix in a Gaussian approximate posterior. Surprisingly, among only the underfit and overfit options, Bayesian model selection via the evidence itself sometimes prefers the overfit version, while the ELBO does not. Bayesian practitioners hoping to scale to large models should be cautious about how reduced-rank assumptions needed for tractability may impact the potential for model selection.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2604.25984 [stat.ML] |
| (or arXiv:2604.25984v1 [stat.ML] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.25984 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Ethan Harvey [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:44:26 UTC (836 KB)