Abstract:Most enterprise document AI today is a pipeline. Parse, index, retrieve, generate. Each of those stages has been studied to death on its own -- what's still hard is evaluating the system as a whole.
We built EnterpriseDocBench to take a swing at it: parsing fidelity, indexing efficiency, retrieval relevance, and generation groundedness, all on the same corpus. The corpus is built from public, permissively licensed documents across six enterprise domains (five represented in the current pilot). We ran three pipelines through it -- BM25, dense embedding, and a hybrid -- all with the same GPT-5 generator.
The headline numbers: hybrid retrieval narrowly beats BM25 (nDCG@5 of 0.92 vs. 0.91), and both beat dense embedding (0.83). Hallucination doesn't grow monotonically with document length -- short documents and very long ones both hallucinate more than medium ones (28.1% and 23.8% vs. 9.2%). Cross-stage correlations are very weak: parsing->retrieval r=0.14, parsing->generation r=0.17, retrieval->generation 0.02. If quality were cascading the way most of us assume, those numbers would be much higher; they aren't. Design caveats are real (parsing fixed, generator shared, automated proxy metrics) and we don't oversell the result.
One result that genuinely surprised us: factual accuracy on stated claims is 85.5%, but answer completeness averages 0.40. The system is right when it answers -- it just leaves things out. That gap matters more for real deployments than the headline accuracy number does.
We also describe three reference architectures (ColPali, ColQwen2, agentic complexity-based routing) which are not yet integrated end-to-end. Framework, metrics, baselines, and collection scripts will be released open-source on acceptance.
| Comments: | 16 pages, 4 tables. Code, metrics, and pilot data to be released upon publication |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2604.26382 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2604.26382v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.26382 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Saurabh Singh [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:48:41 UTC (19 KB)