Abstract:Human recursive numeral systems (i.e., counting systems such as English base-10 numerals), like many other grammatical systems, are highly regular. Following prior work that relates cross-linguistic tendencies to biases in learning, we ask whether regular systems are common because regularity facilitates learning. Adopting methods from the Reinforcement Learning literature, we confirm that highly regular human(-like) systems are easier to learn than unattested but possible irregular systems. This asymmetry emerges under the natural assumption that recursive numeral systems are designed for generalisation from limited data to represent all integers exactly. We also find that the influence of regularity on learnability is absent for unnatural, highly irregular systems, whose learnability is influenced instead by signal length, suggesting that different pressures may influence learnability differently in different parts of the space of possible numeral systems. Our results contribute to the body of work linking learnability to cross-linguistic prevalence.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2602.21720 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2602.21720v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.21720 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Andrea Silvi [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:27:02 UTC (229 KB)
[v2]
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:59:51 UTC (229 KB)