Abstract:This paper establishes a rigorous measurement science for AI agent reliability, providing a foundational framework for quantifying consistency under semantically preserving perturbations. By leveraging $U$-statistics for output-level reliability and kernel-based metrics for trajectory-level stability, we offer a principled approach to evaluating agents across diverse operating conditions. Our proposal highlights the important distinction between the core capability and execution robustness of an agent, showing that minor task-level variations can induce complete strategy breakdowns despite the agent possessing the requisite knowledge for the task. We validate our framework through extensive experiments on three agentic benchmarks, demonstrating that trajectory-level consistency metrics provide far greater diagnostic sensitivity than traditional pass@1 rates. By providing the mathematical tools to isolate where and why agents deviate, we enable the identification and rectification of architectural concerns that hinder the deployment of agents in high-stakes, real-world environments.
| Comments: | 33 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.10516 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2605.10516v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.10516 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Subhabrata Majumdar [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 11 May 2026 13:06:24 UTC (430 KB)