Abstract:Strategic classification studies learning settings in which individuals can modify their features, at a cost, in order to influence the classifier's decision. A central question is how the sample complexity of the induced (strategic) hypothesis class depends on the complexities of the underlying hypothesis class and the cost structure governing feasible manipulations. Prior work has shown that in several natural settings, such as linear classifiers with norm costs, the induced complexity can be controlled. We begin by showing that such guarantees fail in general - even in simple cases: there exist hypothesis classes of VC dimension $1$ on the real line such that, even under the simplest interval neighborhoods, the induced class has infinite VC dimension. Thus, strategic behavior can turn an easy learning problem into a non-learnable one. To overcome this, we introduce structure via a geometric definability assumption: both the hypothesis class and the cost-induced neighborhood relation can be defined by first-order formulas over $\mathbb{R}_{\mathtt{exp}}$. Intuitively, this means that hypotheses and costs can be described using arithmetic operations, exponentiation, logarithms, and comparisons. This captures a broad range of natural classes and cost functions, including $\ell_p$ distances, Wasserstein distance, and information-theoretic divergences. Under this assumption, we prove that learnability is preserved, with sample complexity controlled by the complexity of the defining formulas.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Algebraic Geometry (math.AG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.13426 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.13426v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13426 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Alexander Shlimovich [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 13 May 2026 12:21:56 UTC (78 KB)