Abstract:Calibrated probability outputs of trained classifiers are increasingly used as inputs to downstream regression estimands such as effects, prevalences, or disparities for a latent group observed only on a small labelled subset. A standard practice is to threshold the calibrated score at a confidence cutoff and treat the hard label as the truth. Building on a recent identification result for the underlying moment equation, we develop a calibration-aware diagnostic apparatus for pseudo-labelling pipelines. We derive a closed-form expression for the attenuation bias that confidence thresholding induces in the downstream regression coefficient, and show that the bias can be predicted, before any inference is run, from the residual score variance $V^{*}=\mathbb{E}[\operatorname{Var}(p\mid X)]$ on the unlabelled set after partialling out the downstream controls $X$. We further obtain a sharp sensitivity bound under bounded calibration drift, and identify the boundary $V^{*}=0$, which holds iff $p$ is a deterministic function of $X$; this motivates a structural separation between classifier features $W$ and downstream controls $X\subsetneq W$. Five controlled simulations and a UCI Adult illustration trace the predictions. The contribution is operational: a $(V^{*}, \kappa)$ decision rule that practitioners can compute from any classifier output to decide whether confidence thresholding is safe.
| Comments: | 24 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables |
| Subjects: | Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML) |
| MSC classes: | 62G05, 62J05, 62F12 |
| ACM classes: | I.2.6; G.3 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.12780 [stat.ME] |
| (or arXiv:2605.12780v1 [stat.ME] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12780 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Marcell Tamás Kurbucz [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 12 May 2026 21:49:11 UTC (49 KB)