Abstract:Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) offer interpretable alternatives to black-box predictors by introducing human-relatable concepts before the final output. However, existing CBMs struggle to verify whether predicted concepts correspond to the correct visual evidence, limiting their reliability. We propose a fine-grained CBM framework that grounds each concept in localized visual evidence, enabling direct inspection of where and how concepts are encoded. This design allows users to interpret predictions and verify that the model learns intended concepts rather than spurious correlations. Experiments on medical imaging benchmarks show that our learned concept space is information-complete and achieves predictive performance comparable to standard CBMs, while substantially improving transparency. Unlike post-hoc attribution methods, our framework validates both the presence and correctness of concept representations, bridging interpretability with verifiability. Our approach enhances the trustworthiness of CBMs and establishes a principled mechanism for human-model interaction at the concept level, paving the way toward more reliable and clinically actionable concept-based learning systems.
| Comments: | 10 pages, 4 figures |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.14210 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.14210v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14210 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Yingying Fang Dr [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 14 May 2026 00:08:09 UTC (18,073 KB)