Proposal envisions bringing together leading govts to manage rapid development of advanced AI systems
OpenAI’s backing signals a shift among leading AI developers who are increasingly calling for coordinated international oversight rather than purely national-level regulation. PHOTO: REUTERS
OpenAI has expressed support for the creation of a global artificial intelligence governance body led by the United States, with China also included as a member, in a move aimed at building international coordination on AI safety, standards and oversight as competition between major powers intensifies.
According to Bloomberg, the proposal envisions a formal multilateral framework that would bring together leading governments to manage the rapid development of advanced AI systems.
The idea comes amid growing concerns in Washington, Beijing and other capitals over the risks posed by increasingly powerful AI models, including safety failures, misuse by non-state actors, and geopolitical tensions surrounding technological dominance.
Under the suggested framework, the US would play a leading role in shaping the governance structure, while China’s inclusion would be intended to ensure that the world’s two largest AI ecosystems remain engaged in structured dialogue rather than operating in isolation. The initiative reflects a broader recognition within the tech industry that fragmented regulation could increase global risks and reduce transparency in AI development.
Read More: OpenAI calls for sweeping economic reforms amid rapid growth of artificial intelligence
OpenAI’s backing signals a shift among leading AI developers who are increasingly calling for coordinated international oversight rather than purely national-level regulation. The company has argued in recent discussions that shared rules and safety standards could help prevent catastrophic risks associated with frontier AI systems while still allowing for continued innovation and competition.
The proposed governance body would reportedly focus on several key areas, including the development of safety benchmarks for advanced AI models, information sharing on risks and vulnerabilities and coordination on policies related to high-risk deployments. It could also serve as a platform for dialogue between rival powers at a time when US-China relations remain strained across multiple technological domains.
The push for such a mechanism comes as both the US and China accelerate investments in artificial intelligence, with each side seeking strategic advantage in areas ranging from military applications to economic competitiveness. At the same time, policymakers and industry leaders have increasingly warned that the absence of global coordination could lead to regulatory gaps and uncontrolled risks.
By including China in a US-led structure, proponents argue the framework could help reduce the likelihood of an uncontrolled AI arms race, while creating channels for communication on safety issues even during periods of geopolitical tension. Industry observers say the idea reflects a growing consensus that AI governance will require some form of international cooperation, similar to past efforts in nuclear safety and climate change.