Abstract:While prompt engineering is instrumental in maximizing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference, the role of prompts during training remains critically underexplored. Prevailing fine-tuning paradigms typically treat training prompts as mere surface forms, assuming that semantically equivalent instructions yield identical learning outcomes. However, we reveal that this equivalence is deceptive: while paraphrased prompts often lead to comparable in-task performance, they induce drastically different cross-task impacts regarding catastrophic forgetting and generalization. Crucially, these impacts are positively correlated across tasks, indicating the existence of superior prompts that consistently yield better performance. Furthermore, we discover that these superior prompts can be robustly identified by task loss prior to learning. Leveraging these insights, we introduce State-Adaptive Prompt Optimization (SAPO), a lightweight yet effective training strategy that shifts task formulation from a static input to a dynamic, state-adaptive variable. Comprehensive experiments on diverse benchmarks confirm its effectiveness, which significantly mitigates forgetting while improving generalization, achieving substantial performance gains over state-of-the-art methods. These results provide insights into how training prompts shape learning dynamics and offer a practical recipe for robust fine-tuning. Our code is available at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.01967 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.01967v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.01967 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Wenhang Shi [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:31:28 UTC (492 KB)